The mainstream media organization "Fox News" has posted an article about the recent test and sale of Andrea Rossi's one megawatt cold plant. It's great that they are covering the introduction of the technology to the market, but the article could be more accurate.

A few invited guests await the outcome
of the test of the 1 MW E-Cat on
Oct. 28, 2011
Photo by

Full Disclosure:
PES Network is seeking a business
relationship with Andrea Rossi.
Sterling's trip to Bologna was sponsored
by Farlie Paynter of Canada, as well as
by Mike Spitzauer, CEO of
Green Power Inc (GPI), the
Waste-to-Diesel Fuel company in
, Washington.

By Hank Mills with Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

If you have not read it already, Fox News has posted an article about the test and sale of the world's first one megawatt cold fusion E-Cat plant. Fox News should be commended for being one of the first mainstream media outlets to cover the historic launch of the cold fusion age. However, their article does not seem to be as well worded as it could be, and is not exactly accurate on all counts.

The first issue with the article is that early on it states scientists say cold fusion is impossible. This is not entirely accurate. The fact is many scientists say it is very possible, and some even claim it is an absolute reality. Over the last twenty years hundreds of scientists have been involved in cold fusion research, and thousands of successful cold fusion experiments have taken place. One example of a who claims cold fusion is very possible, is Chief NASA , Dennis Bushnell. He has went so far to state that cold fusion is perhaps the most promising of all cutting edge, alternative . You can read an article about his statements, here.

As the article continues, it claims that many people in the scientific community have dismissed the technology. This is true to an extent, because many scientists are skeptical of breakthrough technologies that challenge the status quo. A good example of this is how there were scientists and engineers declaring that powered flight was impossible, weeks or months after the Wright Brothers few into the sky. However, there are many scientists and engineers that have witnessed demonstrations of the E-Cat technology over the last year, and came away impressed — convinced that the technology represents a novel new source of energy. Dr. Levi of the University of Bologna, Professor , and Dr. Sergio Focardi are just a few names out of many experts that have praised the technology as being valid and real.

Next, the article gives a quote from a scientist who states that the E-Cat test should be treated as a hoax, until independent scientists are able to replicate the results. This statement is overlooking a few important issues. First, there have been many independent scientists witness and participate in tests of E-Cat units. Secondly, the test of the one megawatt plant was complete controlled by the expert engineer representing the customer who was purchasing the plant. If the engineer was not satisfied with the test — that he could conduct in any manner he wanted — he could have easily canceled the purchase. It is important to note however that in these tests Rossi has not allowed scientists to examine the inside of the tiny reactor cores, because inside of them resides the proprietary information that makes the technology work. Namely, a proprietary catalyst and nickel powder that has been treated in very special ways to create an abundance of reaction sites. To protect his industrial secrets and intellectual property, he has had to put some limitations on the information he can provide. 

The article also talks about , and how fission reactors produce large amounts of . But the details about how Rossi's — in terms of produced — is not elaborated on. The fact is his system does produce small amounts of in the form of low energy gamma rays, but they are completely shielded by a couple centimeters of lead. Zero escapes into the environment. It would also have been nice for the author to mention that the E-Cat technology utilizes no radioactive elements, and produces no nuclear waste. It is a completely safe and "green" . In fact, due to the very nature of the way the energy is produced, it is impossible for it to "melt down." This is because if the temperatures inside of the reactor cores rise too high, the nickel powder just melts, and the nuclear reactions cease. There is no disaster like in a fission based nuclear reactor, the system just stops producing heat.

Perhaps the most silly part of the article is the quote stating cold fusion defies the laws of thermodynamics, and a self sustaining cold fusion system is impossible. This statement is not just ridiculous, but is offensive to the intellect of many readers of Fox News. In a cold fusion reaction the energy produced is not "free" coming from no where, but comes from the atomic bonds of the hydrogen and nickel, when they 'fuse" together. Just like in conventional fission energy, the energy comes from a portion of the mass of the atom being converted to energy. There is no difference with cold fusion, except that the radiation released is tremendously less, no nuclear materials are consumed as fuel, and no nuclear waste is produced. Basically, cold fusion has all of the advantages of nuclear power, with none of the drawbacks!

Sterling's Comments

Having attended the historic October 28 test of the E-Cat in Bologna, and being disappointed over the past many months to see so little mainstream coverage of the E-Cat technology since it was announced in January, I was delighted when I received an email from John Brandon the next day, saying: "I'm a reporter with Fox News, can you contact me about the Andrea Rossi experiment?"

I phoned him and we talked for about 20 minutes; then we had about 5 email exchanges thereafter. 

I agree with Hank, that Fox is to be commended for giving this coverage. However, after reading Brandon's story, I must say that it now occurs to me why there isn't more mainstream coverage: It's not easy to get your head wrapped around all this and to get things straight.

Let me make some corrections on his quotations of me.

First, he said:

"Sterling Allan, CEO of the alternative energy news agency Pure Energy Systems, told he attended Rossi’s demonstration and the E-Cat is self sustaining."

Correction: I didn't say it "is" self-sustaining, but that from the best I can tell, it appeared to be. I didn't have enough access during the test to be able to say for sure that this was the case, only that this was the purpose of the test and the customer appears to have signed off on this having occurred. I also would have preferred that he had linked to my report on the Oct. 28 event, rather than linking to our PESN home page.

Next, he wrote:

"Allan hinted on his blog that an unnamed 'customer' of Rossi's device is a military organization that starts with an N. Rossi said this customer measured and verified the test — and told that Paul Swanson with the U.S. Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems unit (SPAWAR) can vouch for the demonstration."

Correction: That reference to a U.S. (I didn't say "military") organization that starts with an N was not in relation to the "customer" but a previous entity that independently and successfully tested the E-Cat. I never intended to tie those two together, and I actually separated them in my communications with him (or at least I thought I did).

I don't know who the customer is, so I can't give hints about it. I told him as much.

Also, I didn't give him the name of Paul Swanson. That must have come from someone else he talked to.

Also, I kind of resent him calling our service a "blog" when its title is "Pure Energy Systems News", I guess that's how the mainstream refers to alternative media.

Later in the article, Brandon quotes the inventor, Rossi as saying: 

"The reactors then produce another 479kWh of energy for another 3-4 hours without needing that initial electrical input — the low-level nuclear reaction continues on its own."

Correction: The output was 479 kW, not kW-h, which is a total measurement, not an instantaneous measurement. Also, the self-sustain mode lasted 5.5 hours, not just 3-4 hours, at the average of 479 kilowatts the entire time, for a total output of 2,635 kilowatt-hours.

Those corrections pointed out, again I applaud Brandon for pursuing this story and getting it up at Fox News.

# # #

This story is also published at BeforeItsNews.

What You Can Do

  1. Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
  2. Join the H-Ni_Fusion technical discussion group to explore the details of the technology.
  3. Once available, purchase a unit and/or encourage others who are able, to do so.
  4. Let professionals in the renewable energy sector know about the promise of this technology. 
  5. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.
  6. Consider investing in Rossi's group once they open to that in October.
  7. Help us manage the PESWiki feature page on Rossi's technology.


1 MW unit tested on October 28, 2011.

PESN Coverage of E-Cat

For a more exhaustive listing, see


See also

Resources at